COMP7004 Class 05.3

We tried to tease out on the board what is meant by "Privacy". We decided that there are public spaces and private spaces, such as home.  We also discussed how there are public places where there is an expectation of privacy, notwithstanding that the space is public.

We figured that privacy is mostly about control over what about us is revealed and to whom.

Colin argued that as well as valuing privacy for itself, we must recognise that privacy is required for other things that we might want to do.  And that although privacy is a right of individuals, a society a large needs to support privacy if it is to achieve its objectives.  This was a harder sell.

We discussed how technology can blur the binary between private and public spaces.

COMP7004 Class 05.2

We looked at professional obligations and whistleblowing.

COMP7004 Class 05.1

We looked at arguments and discussed the difference between false premises and invalid arguments. We looked at some of the most common fallacies that we encounter is shoddy reasoning.  I asked students to work in groups to come up with examples of the different kinds.

COMP7004 Class 04.3

We looked at Codes of Ethics from the IEEE, ACM, and ICS.

COMP7004 Class 04.2

We looked at deontological approaches to ethics. We looked moral absolutism vs. moral relativism

COMP7004 Class 04.1

We had no class today because Colin got the time wrong. I'm very sorry guys.

COMP7004 Class 03.3

We had no class today because Colin was away.

COMP7004 Class 03.2

We had no class today because Colin was away.

COMP7004 Class 03.1

We listed to a BBC documentary about utilitarian ethics and the Trolley Problem.

Would You Push the Big Guy Part I

I asked student to complete the exercise at moralmachne.mit.edu

We discussed self driving car and how bias can be introduced into training of AI.


Students can second to Would You Push the Big Guy Part II here.


There will now other COMP7004 classes this week, because Colin is away.

COMP7004 Class 02.3 Cancelled

This class was cancelled because Colin had a meeting

COMP7004 Class 02.2

We loved at Intuitionsim and Consequentialism.  We will return to consequentialism in the next class.

There will be no class on Thursday because I have a meeting that clashes.

Students have asked me to move classes on Thursdays because of timetable class with another module.  I'll look into it

COMP7004 Class 02.1

We discussed what is meant by CyberEthics and whether it was a field of study distinct from regular ethic or just a subset of it.  We didn't really find an answer.

We looked at the sources of morality and considered Supernaturalism at length. I asked students to think of examples where supernaturalism is invoked in discussions about technology.  Generic engineering and reproductive rights were the two we could think of.

I mentioned Supernaturalism in debates about the environment. But the most interesting (but not convincing) I found are arguments like this against the use of RFID based on Revelations.

In discussions of CyberTechnoloy Supernatural arguments are rarely invoked.